?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

David Yost stars in Degenerate (2010)

as Marcus, a /punk/.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1630541/


He still looks spankable very cute in this, even though he's playing a bad character...he's got the really cute soft voice still.

Trailer:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1630541/



David Yost dressed up as a punk, then and now:






He's back! :)


Crossposted from mmprxcore

Tags:

Comments

( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
germankitty
Aug. 19th, 2011 01:09 pm (UTC)
Punk now? YES, PLEASE!!!!

*drools*
pairatime
Aug. 19th, 2011 05:53 pm (UTC)
if I just saw him but didn't hear him I wouldn't have guessed he's the same guy. wow
khandreia
Aug. 19th, 2011 06:19 pm (UTC)
Same here. He looks so much younger (and quite good-looking, even though I'm not a big fan of facial hair) in that picture than what I've seen of him recently! That's some mighty good make-up work there.
pairatime
Aug. 19th, 2011 06:21 pm (UTC)
I'm not a fan it facial hair either but it does look good on him. but yes they did a great job
hohaiyee
Aug. 19th, 2011 07:19 pm (UTC)
Not a fan of facial hair either, except on Tony Stark, and I actually liked Billy back when he was a dweeb, but he looks good here.

He looks healthy.



We live a lot longer than we used to so 40 can be very young, especially if you keep in shape, and he's a gymnast. A lot of people comment that he aged badly during the No Pink Spandex interview, but keep in mind that:

a) That was what we saw of him when he had JUST finally recovered enough to finally come out, when previously, it got so bad he had walked off the set of PR because he feared he might kill himself, tried to pay the gay away, etc.

b) Though he got better enough to give the interview, he's got to be nervous, people don't look good like that.


Now I gotta figure out how to get that vid when I don't buy things off the internet, maybe I can find a store to order it for me (I know some bookstores do that with books). It look soooo cheesy, but what the hell, he's one of the main cast and he's awesome.
browniebag
Aug. 20th, 2011 03:48 am (UTC)
He looks pretty much the same recently from the interview. The movie was shot years ago, but came out in 2010.
gsyh
Aug. 20th, 2011 04:01 am (UTC)
re: the interview
Most people only saw part 3, and that's where the 'he aged terribly' comments came from. He looked bad in part 3, and in certain parts leading up to it too.

It was probably because he frowned multiple times, and yikes, with the recceeding hairline, the wrinkle effect made him look ancient.

and then there is THIS:

*


I dunno how I explain it, sometimes someone obviously old and wrinkly like Ian McKellen can look young, but other times some young teenager can look really old and tired, and during the interview, that's the vibe I got.

Of course, the him we saw in the film was acting, but I think, from the sound of it, being persecuted, put on the spot, made him too nervous to be on stage, and therefore him being in film again is a sign of happy recovery. Or maybe I'm projecting. I just knew that while I kept writing, I totally quit stuff like choir, band, and drama, during a very terrible spot.

I don't know which came first, the interview or the movie, but I'm not the only one who thinks he looks younger in the movie than in the interview, it's possibly he stressed himself into looking horrible for it again...


*When I see an expression like that, I've always got the urge to punch a wall in the face, nobody should be made to feel like that.
browniebag
Aug. 21st, 2011 02:01 am (UTC)
Re: the interview
The movie was shot right after he left the show, so it definitely came first.

He's getting older, getting a little balder, hairline receding a little further is all.
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

Monica
rangers_daily
Morph a Day

Latest Month

August 2011
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow